Insights
The 90-Day Clock: What to Do With a Notice of Reassessment
A Notice of Reassessment starts a 90-day objection clock from the date on the notice — here is what that clock protects, how collections behaves while it runs, and the narrower routes if it has already passed.
The short answer
A Notice of Reassessment starts a 90-day clock to file a Notice of Objection (Form T400A or through CRA My Account), counted from the date on the notice, not the day you open it. Filing preserves your dispute rights and moves the file to an impartial Appeals review. Missing it narrows, but need not close, your options.
What is the deadline to dispute a reassessment?
Ninety days. A Notice of Reassessment carries a date, and subsection 165(1) of the Income Tax Act gives a taxpayer until 90 days after that date to file a Notice of Objection — the formal, legislated step that opens a dispute. The window runs from the date printed on the notice, not from the day it is opened, forwarded by a bookkeeper, or first understood. Mail delay is counted against the taxpayer, not CRA, so a notice that sits unread for three weeks has already spent three weeks of the clock.
The objection is filed on Form T400A, Notice of Objection – Income Tax Act, or through the "Register my formal dispute" service in CRA My Account, My Business Account, or Represent a Client. A valid objection does more than signal disagreement: it must set out the facts and the reasons, and identify the issues in dispute. A one-line "I disagree" preserves the date but wastes the filing.
One refinement matters for individuals and graduated rate estate trusts. For them the deadline is the later of the 90-day date or one year after the return's filing-due date for the year, so an early reassessment can leave slightly more time. The reliable discipline, though, is to treat the 90-day date on the notice as the deadline and work back from it — never to hope the longer measure applies.
What does filing a Notice of Objection do?
It moves the file. A valid objection takes the matter out of the hands of the CRA auditor who raised the reassessment and delivers it to the Appeals division — a separate part of CRA whose role is to conduct an impartial second look at the assessment on its merits. The appeals officer is not the person who built the reassessment, which is the entire point of the step.
The Appeals review can resolve the dispute in one of three ways: a further reassessment that changes the numbers, a confirmation that leaves them in place, or, for certain determinations, a redetermination. Whatever the outcome, filing the objection is also the mandatory gateway to the Tax Court of Canada — a taxpayer generally cannot appeal to that court without first having filed a valid objection and given CRA the chance to consider it.
There is a quieter benefit. Objecting converts an open-ended argument into a defined process with a file, a reference number, and an officer assigned to it. Facts, reasons, and supporting documents are submitted in an organized record rather than traded informally, which is precisely the discipline a large reassessment rewards. What the objection cannot do is promise a result — it secures the right to be heard, not the answer.
Does an objection stop CRA collections?
For income tax, largely yes — with important limits. Section 225.1 of the Income Tax Act restricts CRA from collecting most disputed income tax while an objection or appeal is outstanding, generally until 90 days after the objection is decided. That restriction is one of the strongest practical reasons to object rather than to let the deadline pass: it holds the collections machinery back while the merits are considered.
The restriction is narrower than it sounds. It does not apply to large corporations in full — CRA may collect half of the amount in dispute from them during the objection. It does not extend to payroll source deductions, which are trust amounts CRA can pursue immediately. And it is a provision of the Income Tax Act only: a GST/HST reassessment is governed by the Excise Tax Act, which contains no equivalent hold, so CRA can continue to collect disputed GST/HST even while an objection to it is under review.
Interest is the part that never pauses. Arrears interest continues to compound daily on any unpaid balance at the prescribed rate throughout an objection, whichever statute applies. A collection hold is a stay, not forgiveness — the meter keeps running while the dispute is decided.
Should I just pay it or object?
It is not an either-or choice, and treating it as one is a common, expensive error. Objecting preserves the right to dispute the tax; paying the assessed amount does not waive that right or concede that the reassessment is correct. The two decisions run on different tracks: one protects the legal position, the other manages the cost of carrying the balance while the position is worked out.
Because arrears interest compounds daily on an unpaid balance, a taxpayer who is confident the money will ultimately be owed — or who simply cannot absorb the interest — may choose to pay the disputed amount and object anyway. If the objection succeeds, CRA refunds the overpaid tax with refund interest; if it fails, the interest clock was stopped in the meantime. Paying under objection buys down interest risk without surrendering the argument.
The decision to pay, part-pay, or hold should be made on the numbers, not on nerves: the size of the exposure, the strength of the position, the interest rate, and the taxpayer's cash. What should not drive it is a wish to make the notice go away, which is how sound objections get abandoned and how conceded years quietly become the template for the next audit.
What if I missed the 90-day deadline?
The position narrows, but it is not always closed. A taxpayer who misses the 90-day window may apply for an extension of time to object under section 166.1 of the Income Tax Act. The application must be made within one year after the objection deadline expired — so, in practice, an outer window of roughly one year and 90 days from the date on the notice. It is discretionary: CRA must be satisfied that there was a genuine intention to object, that the taxpayer could not act or instruct someone to act in time, and that granting it is just and equitable. If CRA refuses, the same application can be taken to the Tax Court of Canada under section 166.2.
Taxpayer relief is a different remedy, and the difference is easy to miss. Form RC4288, Request for Taxpayer Relief, asks CRA to cancel or waive penalties and interest under subsection 220(3.1) — for circumstances such as serious illness, CRA error, or financial hardship. It reaches back up to ten calendar years. What it does not do is dispute whether the underlying tax is correct. Relief can strip penalties and interest from a reassessment; only an objection can challenge the tax itself.
The order of these routes is not interchangeable. An objection protects the whole assessment and has the tightest deadline; the extension application rescues a missed objection; taxpayer relief addresses the penalties and interest layered on top. Confusing the three — filing for relief when an objection was the point — is how recoverable positions are lost to the wrong form.
Why is arguing with the auditor not the same as objecting?
Because they are different stages, and only one stops the clock. A reassessment usually arrives after weeks of correspondence with a CRA auditor, and the natural instinct is to keep that conversation going — send one more schedule, request one more call, wait for the auditor to reconsider. None of that is a Notice of Objection. The audit stage and the objection stage are separate, and an ongoing discussion with the auditor does not pause the 90-day window or substitute for the formal filing.
This is the single most costly mistake made in the first three months of a reassessment. The taxpayer believes the file is still "in discussion," the auditor has moved on, and the deadline passes unmarked. The reassessment then hardens into a debt that can only be reopened through the narrower, discretionary extension route — if at all.
The disciplined course is to do both, in the right order. Keep the professional dialogue open if it may still resolve matters, but file the objection to protect the date regardless. An objection can always be resolved or withdrawn if the discussion succeeds; a lapsed deadline cannot be recovered on request. Preserving the right costs little; forfeiting it can cost the entire dispute.
By the numbers
The figures behind this
- from the date on a Notice of (Re)Assessment to file a Notice of Objection under subsection 165(1) — Form T400A or CRA My Account
- 90 days
- outer window from the date on the notice to apply for an extension of time to object once the 90-day deadline has passed (s.166.1)
- 1 year + 90 days
- look-back window to ask CRA to cancel or waive penalties and interest through taxpayer relief (Form RC4288, s.220(3.1))
- 10 years
from the date on a Notice of (Re)Assessment to file a Notice of Objection under subsection 165(1) — Form T400A or CRA My Account
Source ↗outer window from the date on the notice to apply for an extension of time to object once the 90-day deadline has passed (s.166.1)
Source ↗look-back window to ask CRA to cancel or waive penalties and interest through taxpayer relief (Form RC4288, s.220(3.1))
Source ↗“The costliest mistake I see after a reassessment is spending the 90 days arguing with the auditor instead of filing the objection — the clock does not pause for a conversation.”
Frequent questions
Questions this raises
How is the 90-day objection deadline counted?
- From the date printed on the Notice of Reassessment, not from the day it is received or opened. Under subsection 165(1) of the Income Tax Act the taxpayer has 90 days after that date to file a Notice of Objection. Delivery delay does not extend it. For individuals and graduated rate estate trusts the deadline is the later of that 90-day date or one year after the return's filing-due date — but the safe course is to treat the date on the notice as the deadline.
Can I file the objection myself, or do I need a representative?
- A taxpayer can file without a representative, using Form T400A or the "Register my formal dispute" service in CRA My Account, My Business Account, or Represent a Client. The form is not the hard part. A valid objection has to state the facts, the reasons, and the issues in dispute, and a large or multi-year reassessment rewards an organized, documented filing — which is where advice earns its place.
Does filing an objection stop interest from accruing?
- No. For income tax an objection generally restricts collection of the disputed amount under section 225.1, but arrears interest continues to compound daily on any unpaid balance at the prescribed rate. A taxpayer can pay the disputed tax and object at the same time: paying does not concede the reassessment, and it stops the interest from running while the objection is decided.
Is taxpayer relief the same as objecting?
- No — they are different remedies with different deadlines. An objection (90 days) challenges whether the tax itself is correct. Taxpayer relief on Form RC4288, under subsection 220(3.1), asks CRA to cancel or waive penalties and interest for reasons such as illness, CRA error, or hardship, and reaches back up to ten years — but it does not dispute the underlying tax. Filing for relief when an objection was needed does not protect the assessment.
My reassessment is for GST/HST, not income tax. Is it the same?
- The 90-day objection deadline is the same idea, but GST/HST is governed by the Excise Tax Act, a separate statute. The key practical difference is collection: the income-tax collection restriction in section 225.1 does not apply to GST/HST, so CRA can continue to collect a disputed GST/HST amount even while the objection is under review. The deadline discipline matters just as much.
References
Primary sources
- Income Tax Act, s.165 — Objections to assessment
- Income Tax Act, s.166.1 — Extension of time to object (Minister)
- Income Tax Act, s.166.2 — Extension of time (Tax Court)
- Income Tax Act, s.225.1 — Collection restrictions
- Income Tax Act, s.220(3.1) — Waiver of penalty or interest
- CRA — T400A Notice of Objection (Income Tax Act)
- CRA P148 — Resolving your dispute: Objection and appeal rights under the Income Tax Act
- CRA — Cancel or waive penalties and interest (taxpayer relief)
- CRA — When you owe money: collections at the CRA
Written by
FCCA (United Kingdom)
Published July 10, 2026 · Updated July 10, 2026 · 9 min read
This article reflects tax law and CRA administrative practice as of July 10, 2026. It is general information, not tax, accounting, or legal advice, and reading it does not create a professional-client relationship. Figures, deadlines, and administrative positions change — obtain advice on your own facts before acting.
When the question stops being general.
This analysis sets out how the issue works in principle. A live file turns on its own facts, correspondence, and deadlines. The advisory page below explains how a matter like it is handled in practice; a private consultation is the direct route for a specific situation.
Private consultations available by request. Personally answered — typically within business hours. WhatsApp: +1-647-510-8878.