Insights

Voluntary Disclosures Program After October 1, 2025: The New Rules

The CRA rebuilt its Voluntary Disclosures Program on October 1, 2025 — two relief tracks, a lower bar to qualify, and a door that still closes the moment the CRA makes the first move.

The short answer

On October 1, 2025 the CRA replaced its Voluntary Disclosures Program with a two-track model under Information Circular IC00-1R7. An unprompted (general) application can receive full penalty relief and 75 percent interest relief; a prompted (partial) application, 25 percent interest relief with up to full penalty relief. The tax owing itself is never erased.

What changed in the VDP on October 1, 2025?

The Voluntary Disclosures Program is the CRA's route for a taxpayer to correct an inaccurate or incomplete filing — or to file something that was never filed — before the CRA finds it. On October 1, 2025 the program was rebuilt. Applications received on or after that date are governed by Information Circular IC00-1R7 for income tax and GST/HST Memorandum 16-5-1 for GST/HST, and are filed on the updated Form RC199. Anything received earlier is assessed under the old rules.

Two changes matter most. First, the former “general” and “limited” programs were replaced by two relief tracks — general and partial — with clearer and more generous relief. Second, the bar to qualify was lowered: a taxpayer who has received a CRA “nudge” or education letter about a potential problem, but is not yet under a CRA audit or investigation, can now apply, where the old rules would often have shut that door.

The stated intent is to reduce the barriers to voluntary compliance. The mechanics still reward moving early, and moving completely — the relief a taxpayer receives now turns on when they come forward rather than on whether they can come forward at all.

What is the difference between the general and partial tracks?

The split turns on one question: did the taxpayer come forward on their own, or after the CRA had already signalled interest? An unprompted application — made before the CRA contacted the taxpayer about the issue — normally receives general relief. A prompted application — made after the taxpayer received a communication about potential non-compliance, such as an education or nudge letter — normally receives partial relief.

“Prompted” is not the same as “caught.” A letter inviting a taxpayer to review a type of income is a prompt; a CRA audit or a criminal investigation into the specific matter is enforcement, and once that has begun the disclosure is no longer voluntary at all. The reworked rules widen the middle ground: being nudged now costs a taxpayer some relief, not their eligibility.

The CRA decides which track applies. The words “normally applies” carry weight — relief is granted at the CRA's discretion under the taxpayer-relief provisions of the Income Tax Act, not claimed as of right, and the agency can place an application on the partial track where the facts warrant it.

How much relief does the VDP actually give?

Relief runs along two lines — penalties and interest — and the two tracks differ mainly on interest. A general (unprompted) application that the CRA accepts carries 100 percent relief of the applicable penalties and 75 percent relief of the applicable interest, including on the most recent years. A partial (prompted) application carries up to 100 percent penalty relief and 25 percent interest relief.

Both tracks share one further protection: where the CRA grants relief, it will not refer the taxpayer for criminal prosecution on the disclosed matter. For a taxpayer whose exposure includes potential prosecution, that protection is often the point of the exercise.

What the program does not do matters just as much. It does not erase the tax owing — that remains payable in full. It does not cancel all interest, even on the general track. And it does not oblige the CRA to accept an application: acceptance is discretionary, assessed on the facts, and never automatic. A disclosure relieves the consequences of non-compliance; it does not relieve the underlying obligation.

Who qualifies for a voluntary disclosure?

Information Circular IC00-1R7 sets five conditions, and an application must meet all of them to be valid. A gap in any one of them can make the application invalid — which is why the sequence in which it is assembled matters more than the speed at which it is filed.

  • Voluntary — made before the CRA takes enforcement action related to the information being disclosed, whether against the taxpayer or a related party.
  • Complete — a full and accurate account of all previously unreported or misreported information, across every affected year and tax type.
  • Penalty — involves the application, or the potential application, of a penalty; a filing that carries no penalty exposure does not need the program.
  • One year overdue — includes information that is at least one year past its filing due date (for GST/HST, at least one reporting period past due).
  • Payment — includes payment of the estimated tax owing, or a request to arrange payment, with the application.

When is a voluntary disclosure the right tool?

A voluntary disclosure is a risk-management step, not a way to hide income — its whole design points the other way, toward putting the full record in front of the CRA before the CRA asks for it. The recurring situations are unglamorous: several years of unreported business or investment income; offshore accounts or foreign property that should have been reported; GST/HST collected but never remitted, or a business that never registered; a Foreign Income Verification Statement (Form T1135) that was required and never filed.

What these share is a live, quantifiable penalty exposure that grows with time and compounds with interest. Coming forward converts an open-ended risk — discovery on the CRA's timeline, with full penalties and possible prosecution — into a defined, largely penalty-relieved cost on the taxpayer's own timeline.

The order of operations is the work. The exposure has to be measured across every affected year and tax type before anything is filed, because the application must be complete on arrival and cannot be quietly amended later without cost. Where the facts carry criminal exposure, tax counsel is engaged before the CRA is contacted — solicitor-client privilege protects those discussions in a way that communications with an accountant, in Canada, generally do not.

What are the risks of coming forward?

The central risk is timing. A disclosure is only voluntary until the CRA acts. Once a CRA audit, an investigation, or other enforcement action touches the matter — or a related entity — the window is closed, and the same facts that would have drawn relief now draw full penalties. The value of the program is almost entirely a function of getting there first.

The second risk is completeness. An application built on a partial account is worse than none: it puts the taxpayer on the record, invites scrutiny, and can be rejected for failing the completeness condition — without the relief that was the reason for filing. The discipline the program demands is total disclosure, verified before it is submitted.

The third is discretion. Because relief is granted under the CRA's judgment, an application is a considered request, not a form that clears itself; it can be declined, or accepted on the partial track when the taxpayer expected the general one. None of this is a reason to stay silent — exposure does not improve with age — but it is the reason a disclosure is prepared, not merely sent.

By the numbers

The figures behind this

interest and penalty relief on a general (unprompted) VDP application the CRA accepts — 75 percent of the applicable interest, 100 percent of the applicable penalties
75% + 100%

interest and penalty relief on a general (unprompted) VDP application the CRA accepts — 75 percent of the applicable interest, 100 percent of the applicable penalties

Source ↗
interest relief on a partial (prompted) application, with up to 100 percent penalty relief — the tier for a taxpayer already nudged by the CRA
25%

interest relief on a partial (prompted) application, with up to 100 percent penalty relief — the tier for a taxpayer already nudged by the CRA

Source ↗
documentation lookback — six years for Canadian-sourced matters, ten where the income or assets are located outside Canada (four years for GST/HST)
6 / 10 years

documentation lookback — six years for Canadian-sourced matters, ten where the income or assets are located outside Canada (four years for GST/HST)

Source ↗
A voluntary disclosure is a risk-management decision taken on a clock you do not control — its entire value comes from reaching the CRA before the CRA reaches you.
Muib Khan, CPA, CGA

Frequent questions

Questions this raises

Does a voluntary disclosure cancel the tax I owe?

No. The Voluntary Disclosures Program can relieve penalties and part of the interest, but the tax itself remains payable in full. Payment of the estimated tax owing — or an approved arrangement to pay it — is one of the conditions of a valid application under Information Circular IC00-1R7.

Can I still apply after the CRA has sent me a letter?

It depends on the letter. A general education or “nudge” letter about potential non-compliance now makes an application prompted, which means partial relief — 25 percent of the interest, with up to full penalty relief — rather than disqualification. But once the CRA has begun a CRA audit or investigation into the specific matter, the disclosure is no longer voluntary and the program is unavailable for it.

Will the CRA automatically accept my application?

No. Relief under the program is discretionary — granted under the taxpayer-relief provisions of the Income Tax Act and assessed on the facts of each application. A complete, voluntary, and timely submission is a strong request for relief; it is not a self-executing entitlement.

How many years of records does a disclosure need to cover?

Documentation is generally required for the most recent six years for Canadian-sourced matters, and the most recent ten years where the income or assets are located outside Canada; GST/HST disclosures generally require the most recent four years. The disclosure itself must cover all periods in which the non-compliance occurred.

Does a disclosure protect me from criminal prosecution?

Where the CRA grants relief under the program, it will not refer the disclosed matter for criminal prosecution. That protection is one reason coordination with tax counsel matters where the facts carry criminal exposure — communications with an accountant are generally not privileged in Canada, while solicitor-client privilege protects advice from a lawyer.

References

Primary sources

Written by

Muib Khan, CPA, CGA

FCCA (United Kingdom)

Published July 10, 2026 · Updated July 10, 2026 · 8 min read


This article reflects tax law and CRA administrative practice as of July 10, 2026. It is general information, not tax, accounting, or legal advice, and reading it does not create a professional-client relationship. Figures, deadlines, and administrative positions change — obtain advice on your own facts before acting.

When the question stops being general.

This analysis sets out how the issue works in principle. A live file turns on its own facts, correspondence, and deadlines. The advisory page below explains how a matter like it is handled in practice; a private consultation is the direct route for a specific situation.

Read: CRA Crisis Advisory

Private consultations available by request. Personally answered — typically within business hours. WhatsApp: +1-647-510-8878.